Skip to main content

Inline calculator for amount fields

So you can input: 3 + 4 and it will compute the math for you, so you can be more efficient and not leave the web app to do splits math when needed.

Status: Completed8 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments8

  • Bradley Bernard changed status to Completed
    Team•

    Dec 30, 2025

  • Bradley Bernard

    Team•

    Dec 30, 2025

    This is complete and out on both mobile apps and web app! It shows a calculator UI and exists on a few fields, namely amount fields. Further integration into other fields will come in the future.

  • Bradley Bernard changed status to In Review
    Team•

    Mar 12, 2024

  • Bradley Bernard

    Team•

    Mar 12, 2024

    Hey all, quick question here: where would you expect to use this inline calculator feature (if it existed), so I could understand more about the request?

    IE:

    • Expense modal total amount?

    • Expense modal receipt type?

    • In a manual split?

    Please share if you have a use case :)

    • Brandon Rothweiler

      •

      Mar 12, 2024

      Bradley Bernard Personally, I would expect this feature to work on any field that accepts a monetary amount as input. If it only worked on certain amount fields, I think that would be confusing. However, the place where I'd use it most frequently would be the expense modal total amount field.

      The most common use case is when I have 2 or more transactions that I want to enter into the app as a single transaction. This feature would help to easily sum the amounts.

    • Jonathan Gratton

      •

      Mar 12, 2024

      I agree with Brandon Rothweiler. I would expect any $ amount field to have this functionality. I would also expect more complex calculator functions, such as brackets/multiplication/division, to work as well.

      Eg: ((10.00)x1.13)+((54/2)x1.13)

      However, I'd personally use it most frequently in the split adjustment and manual fields.

    • Bradley Bernard

      Team•

      Mar 12, 2024

      Brandon Rothweiler: Agreed! The q was more to spur use cases. Not planning to have it only select places, no worries :)

      Makes sense, thanks for sharing!

    • Bradley Bernard

      Team•

      Mar 12, 2024

      Jonathan Gratton: Definitely more complicated to get that all to work out, but I'll see what I can do!